Prediction of Dan Martin [740th] vs Benjamin Thomas George [835th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W W W W W
Form
W L L W W L L L L LH2H: Martin 1 - 0 George
They have played 2 sets in total, with Martin winning 2 and George winning 0. The last match between Martin and George was at the San Luis Potosi Challenger, 13-04-2025, Q1 round, Clay with Dan Martin getting the victory 6-2 7-6(12).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dan Martin | 1 |
| Benjamin Thomas George | 0 |
| Martin | Stats | George |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (16-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 27% (3-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 740 | Ranking | 835 |
| 740 | Highest Rank | 826 |
| 25 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 52% (87-80) | Career Total W/L | 47% (29-33) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(12) |
Stats 
Dan Martin
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:53:18 | Average Match Time | 1:53:18 |
| 58% (41/71) | 1st Serve % | 60% (46/77) |
| 63% (26/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (25/46) |
| 50% (15/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (12/31) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (4/10) |
| 52% (40/77) | Return Points Win % | 42% (30/71) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dan Martin vs Benjamin Thomas George Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Martin 1 - 0 George
Editorial Prediction:
Predicting tennis outcomes can often feel like trying to predict the weather with a pair of binoculars and a rubber duck, yet here we stand, stats in hand, ready to make our boldest predictions. When it comes to second serve maneuvers, Martin's got a slight edge, winning 43.86% of those points over the last six months, while George, bless his athletic soul, trails at 39.43%. A solid indicator, some experts smugly nod, of who might sashay away with the victory.
As for return games, Martin seems to be a fan of his opponent's second serve struggles, capitalizing on 46.68% of those, while George laps up a formidable 50.77%. For first serve tells, the stats lean towards George too, gobbling up those points at 31.57%, compared to Martin's 24.62%, suggesting George is possibly a psychic, in disguise, divining the trajectory of incoming missiles.
The tension on court can often be cut with nothing but a spoon, where breakpoints lurk ominously, and saving them becomes a sport within a sport. Martin has been donning his superhero cape here, saving 57.33% of them, while George has managed to fend off 53.33% with equal bravado and vigor, a number to keep an eye on if you're the betting sort.
Performance over the past year provides us with a sweeping narrative. Martin has waltzed to 49.23% wins, dancing elegantly across 65 matches, while George has opted for the modest 40.91% win rate, triumphing in 18 of his 44 ventures onto the tennis battlefield. Quite the saga, these two.
Clay courts are the hallowed grounds where both players seemingly channel their inner gladiator, Martin boasting a win rate of 55% and George gleefully clutching at 54%. Indoors on the hard courts, however, their charisma seems to dim a tad, with Martin at 41% and George at 42%, almost as if they're allergic to its bounce.
Exploring the murky depths of tournament levels reveals that the Futures and Satellites arena appears to be their playground, Martin boasting a 50% win rate while George lingers behind with 41.03%. This discrepancy hints at Martin's slight superiority in tussling with similarly skilled opponents.
Never dismiss the importance of opponent quality, for Martin's foes have boasted an average rank of 158.98, whereas George's challengers rank 410.05. It seems Martin's been brushed by the pas de deux of competition, facing tougher foes than George, thereby sharpening his racquet's prowess.
If this battle of skill and wit ventures into a deciding set, the statistics favor Martin once more with a 35% win rate in these tight scenarios compared to George's 29%. It's as if Martin possesses a reservoir of reserve energy, spurring him forwards when the going gets tough.
When it comes to breakpoint conversion ratio, George flips slightly more opportunities, converting 31.75% compared to Martin's 28.06%, suggesting that George might just have a knack for making the most of critical junctions in a match.
So, as we swish these statistics around our metaphorical teacup, the balance swings ever so slightly in favor of Martin. Perhaps it's the firmer grip on the breakpoints, or maybe just his enchanting performance in tight sets, but in this duel of skill and grunt, Martin emerges as the favorite to claim victory.
Dan Martin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Mateus Alves
54%
(
61 of
112)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
7
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(1) 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Tom Paris
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
74)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Felix Corwin
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(12) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Dan Martin
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
17
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
94%
(
31 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Pinnington Jones
Player
Dan Martin
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Dan Martin
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
1-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Thomas George Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(12) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
67%
(
85 of
127)
1st Serve %
72%
(
96 of
133)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
59 of
96)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
52 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
56 of
133)
131
Total Points Won
129
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
28 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
29 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
61
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Thomas George
Player
Noah Schachter
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Thomas George
Player
Hoyoung Roh
25%
(
1 of
4)
1st Serve %
43%
(
9 of
21)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
1 of
1)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
17
Total Points Won
8
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taha Baadi
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
47%
(
14 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
38
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Thomas George
Player
Nicholas Gore
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (87/80) | Win/Loss | 47% (29/33) |
| 52% (193/177) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (62/71) |
| 52% (1783/1646) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (586/601) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 313 | Aces Total | 36 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
| 313 | Total Double Faults | 234 |
| 1:22:4 | Average Match Time | 1:32:36 |
| 372.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 374.5 |
| 61% (5128/8371) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2142/3405) |
| 66% (3409/5128) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1305/2142) |
| 49% (1596/3243) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (561/1263) |
| 41% (332/802) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (177/387) |
| 39% (3150/8110) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1495/3399) |
| 52% (85/163) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (26/59) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (19/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 47% (18/38) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (5/12) |
| 85% (93/79) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (32/28) |
| 15% (93/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (32/4) |
| 11% (74/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 3% (30/1) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Dan Martin
View full predicted draw for Martin
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
